Pulverized Coal Gasification Filter Bags in Thermal Power Plants

Pulverized Coal Gasification Filter Bags in Thermal Power Plants: Filtration Under Extreme Chemistry and Fine Particulate Stress

Pulverized coal gasification pushes dust filtration into a regime that is fundamentally different from conventional boiler flue gas. The challenge is not simply high temperature or high dust load. It is the combination of ultra-fine char particles, reactive gas chemistry, pressure stability requirements, and continuous operation that defines whether a filter bag succeeds or quietly degrades.

In gasification-based thermal power plants, filter bag selection is a process-critical decision, not a consumable choice.

Why Gasification Dust Is Not “Normal Fly Ash”

Dust generated in pulverized coal gasification systems—particularly upstream or downstream of gas cleanup units—differs sharply from boiler fly ash:

• Extremely fine particle size, often sub-micron char and ash
• Low bulk density with high mobility
• Reactive surface chemistry, influenced by syngas components
• Minimal natural cake cohesion, leading to penetration risk

These particles are difficult to capture with depth filtration alone. Once they enter the felt structure, recovery is limited, and pressure behavior becomes unstable.

The Chemical Environment Changes Everything

Gasification introduces a chemical profile rarely seen in standard power plant filtration:

• Reducing atmospheres mixed with CO, H₂, and trace sulfur compounds
• Potential exposure to H₂S, COS, and acid-forming species
• Temperature profiles that fluctuate during load changes and startups

Filter bags that rely on organic fiber stability alone often show chemical embrittlement or permeability loss long before thermal limits are reached.

This is why gasification filtration failures are often misdiagnosed as “temperature problems” when they are actually chemistry-driven.

Why Surface-Controlled Filtration Becomes Essential

In pulverized coal gasification systems, the core filtration question is:

How do we prevent ultra-fine char from entering the filter structure at all?

Surface-controlled filter bags—laminated or membrane-based—address this by:

• Forcing particle capture at the surface
• Minimizing internal contamination
• Enabling more predictable cleaning response
• Stabilizing pressure drop over long campaigns

Depth-type filter bags may meet initial emission targets but often lose stability as fine particles migrate inward.

Common Filter Bag Materials Evaluated in Gasification Applications

Filter media selection depends on the exact gasification configuration, but the following materials are most frequently considered.

Filter Media	Temperature Capability	Chemical Resistance	Filtration Mode	Typical Behavior in Gasification
Polyester Needle Felt	≤130 °C	Poor	Depth	Generally unsuitable
PPS Needle Felt	≤190 °C	Good (acidic)	Depth	Sensitive to oxidation and penetration
PPS + PTFE Laminated	≤190 °C	Very good	Surface	Stable DP if chemistry is controlled
Aramid (Nomex®)	≤220 °C	Moderate	Depth	Handles heat spikes, limited chemical tolerance
PTFE Needle Felt	≤260 °C	Excellent	Surface	Best long-term stability, premium option
Fiberglass Composite	≤260 °C	Poor vs alkali	Rigid surface	Limited flex tolerance

This comparison highlights a recurring pattern: gasification favors chemical inertness and surface filtration over fiber depth and flexibility.

Pressure Drop Behavior Reveals Filtration Health Early

In gasification systems, pressure trends are often the first reliable indicator of mismatch.

Watch for:

• Gradual baseline DP rise despite normal cleaning
• Reduced pressure recovery after pulses
• Increased pulse frequency without airflow improvement

These signs usually indicate fine particle penetration or chemical interaction, not insufficient cleaning energy.

Increasing pulse pressure typically worsens the problem by driving fines deeper into the media.

Cleaning Strategy Must Be Conservative and Consistent

Gasification dust does not tolerate aggressive cleaning.

Effective systems typically use:

• Lower pulse pressure than boiler baghouses
• Longer cleaning intervals
• Acceptance of a thin, stable char cake

This cake acts as a protective layer, reducing direct particle impact on the media surface.

Startup and Upset Conditions Matter Disproportionately

Many gasification filter bags fail early due to poor startup discipline:

• Cold starts introduce condensation and acid formation
• Rapid load ramps shock the filter surface
• Cleaning begins before cake stabilization

Filter bags that survive the first few weeks under controlled conditions often show very stable long-term behavior.

A Practical Engineering Perspective

Pulverized coal gasification filtration is not an extension of conventional power plant dust collection. It is a different filtration regime.

Successful systems are built around:

• Ultra-fine particle control
• Chemical inertness of the filter media
• Surface-dominated filtration behavior
• Conservative, well-disciplined cleaning strategies

When these elements are aligned, emissions stabilize and bag life becomes predictable. When they are not, even high-grade filter bags fail quietly and repeatedly.

Omela Filtrations supports pulverized coal gasification filtration in thermal power plants by aligning dust characteristics, gas chemistry, filtration mode, and cleaning behavior, ensuring filter bags perform reliably under the real operating stresses of gasification—not just under nominal design conditions.

---